The Power of the Written Word
Posted by over_the_EdGE at 03:03 PM on October 1, 2006.
September 29th
Sitting at my desk trying to invent a word yesterday brought back memories of the last time I did so. I had tried for days and days to hit upon the right name for 'the receptacle in which a Dark wizard has hidden a fragment of his soul for the purposes of attaining immortality.' Finally, after much transposition of syllables, I scribbled 'Horcrux' on a piece of paper and knew it was The One. But what if somebody had already used it? With some trepidation I typed 'Horcrux' into Google and, to my delight, saw what I was looking for: 'Your search - "Horcrux" - did not match any documents.'
So anyway, yesterday I Googled 'Horcrux' again. 401,000 results. As you might imagine, this gave me something of a lift as I went back to scribbling nonsense words on the back of a takeaway menu.
Friday 29 September 2006
Banned Books Week
Once again, the Harry Potter books feature on this year's list of most-banned books. As this puts me in the company of Harper Lee, Mark Twain, J. D. Salinger, William Golding, John Steinbeck and other writers I revere, I have always taken my annual inclusion on the list as a great honour.
"Every burned book enlightens the world." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
People have always seemed to be puzzled as to how someone like me, allegedly a artsy-fartsy sort of guy, could like something as juvenile as Harry Potter. For one, it is not just a fad, but rather a phenomenon. Anything that gets so many people to read can't be all bad. Granted that it's not the deepest thing every written, it is also far from shallow. Besides, depth can be overrated at times, especially when it is done for it's own sake.
These two short entries from JK Rowling's website reinforce the power of the written word. She has started to influence the way people use the language. Nearly anything in Literature that is banned, much more than popular, usually presents a fresh new idea that disturbs the minds of the stodgy old folks who determine what Literature allegedly is. Usually those people die off and these "radical" books enter the canon and effectively changing the literary landscape.
In fact, Harry Potter has already begun reshaping the English language. The Oxford English Dictionary, which has only been revised thrice in the last 149 years, has included the word, "Muggle" in its hallowed pages.
Muggle: invented by JK (Joanne Kathleen) Rowling (b. 1965), British author of children's fantasy fiction (see quot. 1997).
In the fiction of JK Rowling: a person who possesses no magical powers. Hence in allusive and extended uses: a person who lacks a particular skill or skills, or who is regarded as inferior in some way.
While far from Shakespearean in its scope and influence, it still speaks volumes of the nature of literature and the English language.
Sitting at my desk trying to invent a word yesterday brought back memories of the last time I did so. I had tried for days and days to hit upon the right name for 'the receptacle in which a Dark wizard has hidden a fragment of his soul for the purposes of attaining immortality.' Finally, after much transposition of syllables, I scribbled 'Horcrux' on a piece of paper and knew it was The One. But what if somebody had already used it? With some trepidation I typed 'Horcrux' into Google and, to my delight, saw what I was looking for: 'Your search - "Horcrux" - did not match any documents.'
So anyway, yesterday I Googled 'Horcrux' again. 401,000 results. As you might imagine, this gave me something of a lift as I went back to scribbling nonsense words on the back of a takeaway menu.
Friday 29 September 2006
Banned Books Week
Once again, the Harry Potter books feature on this year's list of most-banned books. As this puts me in the company of Harper Lee, Mark Twain, J. D. Salinger, William Golding, John Steinbeck and other writers I revere, I have always taken my annual inclusion on the list as a great honour.
"Every burned book enlightens the world." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
People have always seemed to be puzzled as to how someone like me, allegedly a artsy-fartsy sort of guy, could like something as juvenile as Harry Potter. For one, it is not just a fad, but rather a phenomenon. Anything that gets so many people to read can't be all bad. Granted that it's not the deepest thing every written, it is also far from shallow. Besides, depth can be overrated at times, especially when it is done for it's own sake.
These two short entries from JK Rowling's website reinforce the power of the written word. She has started to influence the way people use the language. Nearly anything in Literature that is banned, much more than popular, usually presents a fresh new idea that disturbs the minds of the stodgy old folks who determine what Literature allegedly is. Usually those people die off and these "radical" books enter the canon and effectively changing the literary landscape.
In fact, Harry Potter has already begun reshaping the English language. The Oxford English Dictionary, which has only been revised thrice in the last 149 years, has included the word, "Muggle" in its hallowed pages.
Muggle: invented by JK (Joanne Kathleen) Rowling (b. 1965), British author of children's fantasy fiction (see quot. 1997).
In the fiction of JK Rowling: a person who possesses no magical powers. Hence in allusive and extended uses: a person who lacks a particular skill or skills, or who is regarded as inferior in some way.
While far from Shakespearean in its scope and influence, it still speaks volumes of the nature of literature and the English language.










